Labor urges Dominic Raab to fight “chaos” in the justice system | Dominique raab


Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy urged Dominic Raab to tackle “chaos” in the justice system before deselecting human rights law, after Raab said he wanted to curtail the power of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on government.

Raab used an interview with the Sunday Telegraph to signal that he would revise the Human Rights Act, which brought the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, with a view to limiting the influence of the Strasbourg court.

But Lammy said it wasn’t the right priority. “Rape convictions are at historically low levels and women are rapidly losing faith in the criminal justice system, while record backlogs have left courts at a breaking point. And yet Dominic Raab’s priority seems to be to undermine the vital human rights legislation that protects us all, ”he said.

“Instead of trying to weaken the rule of law, the Conservatives need to explain how they plan to address the chaos they have created in the justice system.”

Raab’s predecessor Robert Buckland said in a letter to the Prime Minister after his dismissal that the justice system had suffered “years of underfunding”.

In his interview, Raab outlined plans to limit the powers of the ECHR in the UK, allowing the government to legislate to “correct” judgments ministers deem wrong.

Long-time skeptic of the Human Rights Act, which brought the rights convention into UK law, he was given the post of justice in Boris Johnson’s September reshuffle .

“I don’t think it’s the job of the European Court in Strasbourg to dictate, whether it’s the NHS, whether it’s our social protection or whether it’s our police force,” he said.

“We identify the problems and make sure we solve them… We will get into the habit of legislating more periodically and thinking about the mechanism for that. Where there have been judgments which, although correctly and duly rendered by the courts, we believe to be wrong, the good thing is that parliament is legislating to correct them. The proposals should be published before the end of the year.

Raab has also said he is looking again at how the judicial review process works – something Buckland looked at before being sacked by Johnson last month.

Raab expressed concern that judicial review was being used to ‘harpoon’ infrastructure projects – such as the long-awaited excavation of the A303 tunnel near Stonehenge, whose authorization was canceled by the government. High Court in July.

The judicial review process sparked furor within the government when Johnson’s 2019 prorogation of Parliament was overturned by the Supreme Court.

Wera Hobhouse, spokesperson for LibDem Justice, said: “This decision to weaken the opportunity for people to challenge this government, or any future government, because sometimes the courts rule against them, weakens our democracy until in the heart. Governments make mistakes and being able to hold them to account as citizens is fundamental. “

Interior Minister Priti Patel complained about the interference of “militant lawyers” in immigration cases. Raab has suggested he would seek to limit appeals against immigration court rulings, which he says have a 3% success rate.

“We know we have a very contentious culture, I myself am a recovering lawyer and we rightly have judicial checks on the executive,” he said. “But it must be done in a constructive and meaningful way that enables the government to carry out the projects that it is charged and mandated by parliament to do. [and ensures that] taxpayers’ money is not wasted because projects are harpooned.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.